November 7th, 2005
In Nationals I recorded passing data from four games using an audio recorder (Jam-Pike on Thu, Furious-Sockeye on Fri, Jam-Furious semifinal and Furious-Sockeye final). I will use the next few days in transcribing those games (starting with final), but I thought to collect my thoughts on pass-level note taking of games.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Ultimate | No Comments »
October 2nd, 2005
Auch, one week and no post from me - instead there seems to be a bunch of great posts from various people. Thanks for keeping this blog interesting.
After running around in CTIA and related events for the whole week, I decided to use a few hours to program a small python app to analyze sequences of passes (strings of players and strings of certain types of passes). I wanted to look past single passes to find out if there is a dominant string of players in a team. Or if a team seems to use a certain sequence of passes, like dumps after short attacking passes. Again I used data from WUGC open final: Canada vs. USA. small set of data, I admit.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Ultimate | 3 Comments »
September 24th, 2005
In social network analysis world there are tools to visualize static networks, like friendship, communication, trade, etc. Examples of such tools are Pajek and Netdraw and more programmatic tools like GUESS. However if one wants to visualize the change of network over time, possibilities are much more limited. One can for example calculate various network metrics (like centrality, betweenness) on different time points and plot these values on a graph. Another possibility is to use SoNIA. Some time ago I experimented with that tool using ultimate passing data as a data set.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Ultimate | 4 Comments »
September 21st, 2005
During the weekend I decided to write down the definite answer for individual offensive ratings. After spending way too much time without being able to formulate even one paragraph for that post, I was forced to downgrade my objective. Now I just hope to start some discussion on this topic. Quite lame, I have to admit.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Ultimate | 15 Comments »
September 15th, 2005
After writing about Jam-Kaos game I started thinking of what is the scoring efficiency in high level games in general. I have no recent data on that (except from a few selected games). However some time ago I got from Sholom Simon some RUFUS stats from mid-90s.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Ultimate | 5 Comments »
September 12th, 2005
Watched the “final” of Norcal sectionals today. Short story: Kaos won 13-11.
A little longer recap. Kaos started well and Jam started a little wobbly. The score was soon 3-0 for Kaos, altough both teams had turned it over; Jam 5 times (few hucks and a drop), Kaos two times. Then Jam answered with 3-0 run of its own. First half in general was shaky on both sides. Kaoes got to the half leading 7-5. At that point the trunover total was Kaos 6, Jam 8.
On the second half both teams played a little better (less turnovers), although in some points there were quite a few calls. I guess the total turnover count was 9-10 to Kaos (resulting in 59% and 52% scoring efficiency).
Some notables. On Kaos Tyler had a great game. Chris McManus made a sweet layout catch (Brandice got at a great photo of that). Both teams had nice pressure defenses, but also a few major mistakes (guy cutting deep was not being covered).
Posted in Ultimate | No Comments »
September 7th, 2005
I compiled from-to matrices for all the Team USA goals (who passed to whom) and similar matrices for passes just before goal passes - so called second assists. (I wanted to compare these passes and their correlation to the total number of passes, as there was some time ago short discussion in the ultimate statistics Yahoo group about value of 2nd assists compared to goal passes).
Similar results as yesterday. Goal passes correlated closer to total passes, although the correlation was not high (Pearson correlation only 0.476 compared to 0.381 for second-assist passes). However there was virtually no correlation between 1st and second assists - sort of interesting.
Another interesting tidbit was that the highest number of goal passes in one game from one person to another was 2. In the summary matrix the highest number was 5 (Watson to Ziperstein and Ziperstein to Eastham). And there was no player who passed at least one goal to every other player. It is no surprise that Namkung was closest to reach this milestone (no goal passes to Fontenette though) - as one probably remembers Namkung was the bridge between male and female players.
Posted in Ultimate | 5 Comments »
September 6th, 2005
I started studying if goal passes (from person a to person b), or “leading passes” (the pass from player a to player b, which precedes a goal pass, similar to second assist in ice hockey) are correlated to the numbeor of passes between these players. I started with the final game, and used tools in UCINET (Quadratic Assigment Procedure or somthing along the lines). To my surprise the goal passes had stronger correlation to the distribution of all passes than the “leading passes”. In any case the correlation was not especially strong. The sum of goal and leading passes had a little stronger correlation, which was not a big surprise as this way I was comparing bigger chunck of the passes to the all passes of the game. I will post the numbers of this analysis over the whole tournament as soon as I get that done (probably tomorrow).
Posted in Ultimate | No Comments »
September 3rd, 2005
Tarr asked for data showing how many passes one person throws to another on average while they are on the field. Turns out not so many. Here is sample from the Final game Team USA against Australia. The numbers in the cells are calculated dividing the total number of passes between players (directional) with a number describing how many points the players were on the field at the same time and during which points USA had possession. So if the players were on the field during a defence-only point, those points were discarded from the calculations.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Ultimate | 3 Comments »
August 29th, 2005
As I have not proceeded much in the analysis of Team USA ultimate passing networks during the weekend, I will instead show what kinds of visualizations of passes one could work out with network visualization tools. Most of the pictures are created using NetDraw (a complementary visualization package to UCINET social network analysis tool).
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Ultimate | 2 Comments »